Road Search


 

RECENT COMMENTS

Recommended Reading
Powered by Squarespace

 

 

Click on Images for Amazon.co.uk link


 

 

On the Threshold of Hope: Opening the Door to Hope and Healing for Survivors of Sexual Abuse

 

 

Mending the Soul, by Steven R. Tracy

Steven Tracy’s website has six .pdf files on the subject, three by Tracy and three personal accounts of abuse and healing. Or you can find them here, in my downloadable PDF files. sidebar.

 

 

 

I don’t believe everything I read, but below are some things I found interesting. I wish I had more time for some of them. For a few other items, click on Links in the header above. 

       

Friday
12Mar2010

Protestant or Catholic: Be careful in your debate

Since the Reformation, a theological battle has raged between Protestants and Catholics. The differences have spilled over to political debate and even war, blood being shed by both sides. I am not addressing the merits of the respective positions here, but I am offering a quotation that bears strongly on the way in which we disagree. I offer it here because I continue to be disappointed by the way professing Christians attack those who disagree with them. Reference Walter Veith’s webite as an example of what I consider unacceptable diatribe against Catholics and other groups. An example I consider generally more objective in his voice of dissent is from Bill Cork, a former Catholic and now Adventist pastor.

All men and women have a moral obligation to promote truth over error, but that obligation, given them of God and confirmed in the ministry of his Son, Jesus Christ, does not sanction force, cruelty, or even condemnation. Even when acceptable, the unrelenting, daily nature of some debates create an unacceptable spirit, merely by the compounded weight of repeated attack. The gospel is a postive message. Yes, Christ said he came to bring a sword, in a certain context, but that does not keep him from being the Prince of Peace. The controversy (sword) that he brought was in the preaching and example of humility in the face of pride, the preaching of love in the face of hatred. It was his opponents, not Christ, who drew the sword, spilling his blood.

Christ, in his sinlessness and prophetic office, had prerogatives of judgment not afforded others. He could read the thoughts and intentions of the heart. He knew the motive of all he met. We do not. We may and should defend the truth against lies and against attacks, but the weapons of our warfare should never bear the imprint of evil. We are to speak with the gentleness and love a humble heart creates. Even in rebuke, even in strong disagreement, our tone and assumptions should assume a deep compassion, avoiding any impression of unfairness or character assassination.

The quote below, which speaks directly to my point, is from an early founding member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, Ellen G. White. She was no stranger to controversy. She was and remains the object of virulent personal attacks from time to time. However, I fully support her work and consider her an authority of highest standing in all things spiritual. I do accept her work as prophetically inspired. That said, here is something of what she had to say on the way Protestants should regard their Catholic brothers and sisters in Christ:

    It is true that we are commanded to “cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and show My people their transgression, and the house of Jacob their sins.” Isaiah 58:1. This message must be given; but while it must be given, we should be careful not to thrust and crowd and condemn those who have not the light that we have. We should not go out of our way to make hard thrusts at the Catholics. Among the Catholics there are many who are most conscientious Christians and who walk in all the light that shines upon them, and God will work in their behalf. Those who have had great privileges and opportunities, and who have failed to improve their physical, mental, and moral powers, but who have lived to please themselves and have refused to bear their responsibility, are in greater danger and in greater condemnation before God than those who are in error upon doctrinal points, yet who seek to live to do good to others. Do not censure others; do not condemn them. From the book, “Testimonies, Vol. 9, page 243, by Ellen White.

It is common today in some Adventist circles, to frequently and presistantly make hard, attacking statements against public figures, political or religious. It is as if this statement was never read, or ignored, or simply denied. But such attacks on persons, persons such as the Pope, are uncalled for and not done in the spirit of love.

I reserve my right to openly disagree with some Catholic doctrine. I believe some beliefs of the Catholic church undermine some Biblical truth. I also regret and repudiate the violence both Catholics and Protestants have exercised toward those they deemed “heretics”.

While heresy is a real concern for the church, one I too have spoken against, the violent attitudes and actions shown our opponents is not Christian. I know this spirit of violence is still alive in the world and I believe the prophets when they say it will increase. I believe religious persecution, from every side, from Protestant and Catholic, will increase against those who stand for Biblical truth. However, I choose today and I hope forever to not be part of that class who use evil to overcome good.

 

Friday
12Mar2010

Walter Veith: A short review of my past objections to his work

I think i need to add a word of explanation for newer readers, especially for my church members in Kentucky. Some of you may have noticed the discussion in my my comments section regarding the teachings of Walter Veith, a pastor and evangelist of the Seventh-day Adventist church.

In 2008 I posted four times on the work of Dr. Veith (he holds a Ph.d in Zoology). Veith is an ordained pastor of the Seventh-day Adventist church. I believe he is still based out of South Africa. For more information you can see his website here. I objected strongly to the conspiracy theories he offers in his “Total Onslaught” DVD series, clips of which you can find on YouTube. As your pastor, for those who are members, I would advise great care with Dr. Veith’s website. Should you choose to explore it in depth, I would do so in a spirit of careful, considered inquiry. Check the “facts” offered. Be sure quotes are in context and represent the writers orginal meaning. Check the sources for accuracy, authority, and bias.

Though it has been almost two years ago, 30 percent of the search traffic on my blog relates to Dr. Veith. These posts continue to generate the largest comment content on this blog. I have chosen not to close those comment sections because it seems obvious to me that the question is very much alive on the internet and within the Adventist church. I try to respond to each comment made, even though this has involved repeating myself from time to time.

Some of those who leave comments appear to be very angry with me, going so far as to accuse me of being a child of Lucifer. At least one man does so with entire web pages.

I’m not posting now to make a personal defense or review my objections to some of Dr. Veith’s teaching. If your interested in that, you can enter search words such as “Walter Veith” in the search box in the upper right side of this blog. You will find more than you probably care to read. You would see how much the intervening two years have generated.

I’ll close this explanation by saying I am not familiar with any changes Dr. Veith may have made in his work to date. Though his website is current and would offer that opportunity, my curent work doen’t allow me the time to keep exploring this single issue. A brief look in that direction does suggest to me that matters remain largly the same.

In 2008 my interest had more to do with the effect of his conspiracy theories on my local churches in Wales and the church in Europe as a whole. I stand by my objections, though on review, I wish I had stated them with less “vigor” from time to time. But you should not consider that caveat a retraction of my objections to the preaching of conspiracy theories or to the distortions of Bible prophecy they create.

My objections to Dr. Veith’s teaching have not been intended as a personal attack on his character, though many seem to construe any objection to the work of a pastor as just that. Separating objections to the work of a man and the man himself is not always easy. I do apologize if I have not made that clear.

I have no doubt this post, because it intentiionally contains Walter Veith’s name and restates my objection, will be a new source of comment. It will more than likely generate more invective and diatribe me personally. I do not plan on repeatedly answering old arguments. I would refer objectors to my previous writing unless they offer something truly new.

Wednesday
10Mar2010

Questioning the Media Mechanics

     The thoughts of the previous post were motivated by the negative polarization of ideas and groups so common today. Both religious and secular spheres seem plagued by cajoling, dividing interests. “Special” self-interest groups chronically promote their own agendas through various forms of media. Once their message is ensconced in print or digitized on disc, it takes on an air of authority and credibility easily digested by pre-programmed members of the group. Truth and legitimacy are assumed without facing the rigors of careful examination. The media is the message and the message of modern media is not very open to examination.
     Such testing is much more difficult with digital media. Documentation is often replaced by assertion and insinuation; evocative, emotive pictures take the place of reason. It is very time consuming to even locate and record, let alone check, the sources many media-mad teachers and preachers offer.
     An example of this dilemma is the chronic, pervasive gullibility perpetuated by religious conspiracy theorist. “Evidence” is contrived out of suggestion, innuendo, and hear-say “sources” from other like-minded theorist. This is often done without revealing the nature of the quoted source. Old, widely disputed sources are used as “evidence” or “proof” without disclosing the disputed nature of the source. Distrust and fear are repeatedly appealed to. Scripture is forced into a ready-made mold, separated from it’s original context, then used as “proof” to support the most twisted reasoning. Bigotry soon comes to be seen as spiritual power. And all this is heartily consumed by those pre-conditioned with a fear of any authority, institution, or organization.  
     Today,  Powerpoint, Keynote, and other media presentations are often used to foster the feeling of legitimacy without providing the viewer time to weigh each “truth” or fact. Images are juxtaposed against one another while in the background we are expected to accept uncritically the interpretation of the speaker. Signs and symbols and images and words are piled on one another until, by sheer weight, they take on the aura of “truth”. After all, how could “all of this” not add up to something? It must be meaningful if someone with a Ph.d has taken the time to assemble such a quantity of material. After all, they can be trusted to use it all properly because they have the ordained authority of the church behind them or they hold a high position in their university or they are the leader of a large, profitable company. They must be credible. 
     Perhaps they are. But how will we know? I have come to distrust any presenter and presentation that asks me to suspend my reasoning faculties, that does not allow me the time to carefully weigh their argument or test their facts. More so, I distrust these media mechanics who will not put their teaching in print where it can more easily be evaluated.
     Technology is merely a tool that extends our abilities to work, to achieve, to accomplish our goals. Used well and wisely it serves a good function. Technology or other tools in teaching are useful if they are not used to violate the humanity they were created to serve. But it takes time and forethought, it takes a sound ethic system to keep our teaching and our tools from doing more harm than good. It also takes time to continually submit our methods and our messages to the carefully scrutiny all truth-claims should expect. 
     I choose to test every word offered as “the way of life” for my instruction or salvation. I hope you will choose to do the same. 

 

Wednesday
10Mar2010

Test Your Teachers

For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths. 2Timothy 4:3-4
    Paul’s warning about false teaching applies to any teaching, whether it comes from inside or outside the church. Those who cannot endure the sound teaching of Scripture—Paul taught Scripture to be the basis of sound teaching—will find teachers who justify their own view of the world, a view that allows them to follow the desires of a carnal heart. 
    The practice Paul speaks of is common today across a wide cross section of “believers”. There are prosperity preachers who will justify our greed, conspiracy theorist who will justify our paranoid bigotry, hedonist who will let us indulge every illicit pleasure, ascetics who bolster our pride in self-immolation, and zealots who feed our our political ambitions. 
    There are are religious “ministries” and secular programs that cater to every human whim, every human lust, any human weakness, any evil trait of humanity. And they will do it in the name of God. They will claim his authority while commanding the allegiance due to Christ alone. 
    In the preceding chapter of Paul’s 2nd letter to Timothy, chapter three, he offers guidance for those in danger from those who are “lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God”. He points Timothy to the Scriptures, to the inspired Word of God. He tells him this is the sure way of discerning false teaching from the true, the way to know the will of God, the way of life for those who would shape and control their desires with truth.
But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it and how from childhood you have been acquainted with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work.  2 Timothy 3:14-17 
     This counsel from the apostle will guard our own hearts and minds as we approach the consummation of God’s plan for our salvation. As God brings to a close the controversy between good and evil, as he fulfills his covenant promises with the restoration of man in his own image, along with the full re-creation of this earth, he would guide us and keep us through the final battle by counsel from his Word. 
     Every teaching, every value of life can safely be tested by a careful study of God’s word. We have a standard in the Word of God by which we can test every teacher and teaching. “To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them”.(Isa 8:20 NKJ)
     Listen carefully to those DVD’s and podcast you cherish. Keep the Scriptures with you during the sermon or lectures you attend. Weigh the teachings, the sentiments, even the methods against the teaching of Scripture and the example of Christ. This is the only safe way to discern the truth in a world so full of uncertainty and deception. 
     Perhaps an even better way would be to take a break from these cherished teachers and spend that time reading and meditating on the Word of God, not to sustain your views but to know God and do his will.
     If men and women spent more time in Scripture and less time following their favorite teachers, they would find the greatest of all teachers, Jesus Christ, close to their hearts as they read his word and pray for his guidance. No other book, no DVD, no lecture or sermon can compare with the more direct communion open to us in the Word of God. If more time were spent meditating on the Word of God for ourselves we would have a greater confidence and peace, greater than any other teacher could give us. 
     Take time today to hear God speak to you personally in his Word. Test the spirits to know if they agree with the teaching of Christ. Know the Word and the truth will set you free. “And if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed”. 
Tuesday
09Mar2010

From My Phone

This is a little test of my new iPhone application. I can now post to my blog using my iPhone. Not sure how much I'll want or need to do this or if it will change how I use this space. It would certainly make it easy to microblog, to post short, frequent updates. But then that might lead to more trivial posts, something like this one, something more casual, something to fill the void just for the sake of it.

Still, I like having the choice. What I choose to do with it will say something, one way or another, about the things I value. There is at least a lesson worth learning in that.

Af the moment this new way of posting is proving useful since I'm alone in my office without my Mac. I came by with Sharon for our second meeting with a baptismal candidate, someone who is becoming a friend. That meeting is over. Now I'm waiting for Sharon to finish rehearsing with her worship team.

I think now would be a good time to stop writing with both thumbs and do some reading.

Monday
08Mar2010

Suffering Vanity

Vanity is a common theme running through my head today. Perhaps it has something to do with shopping for shoes. I don’t need any more shoes and I didn’t buy any more shoes, but I wanted some. I tried on several pair waiting for Sharon as she shopped. She did need a pair and found some. 

On the way home we stopped at Krogers for a few groceries. She went in. I parked and sat in the Audi, slightly slouched in my leather seat, thinking more about my vanity and comfortable life. As I thought I watched. Men and women moved across the parking lot. A tall grey man in maroon and kaki, long-legged, short-waisted, heavy through the bottom like a pear, limped slowly across the drive, stumbling and stopping and starting again just before the doors. Was it age or illness that made him limp?

A mature woman with long, brown, stringy hair, her right hand clinched palm up, awkwardly, unnaturally like a claw, walked next to a shorter, older woman, someone I imagined as her mother. I couldn’t remember ever seeing legs so thin. They were tightly wrapped in black jeans. How did she get them on? One leg seem thinner than the other. Unable to fully lift her right foot, she pulled it behind her, catching the edge of her white shoe where the asphalt met the sidewalk. She wore a flowing black cloak festooned with brightly colored musical notes and a keyboard, perhaps in memory of a time when she could extend her long fingers toward the piano. A young, bulging woman laughed behind her, at her I think; her husband looked down at his feet as he shushed her. 

I thought of Christ in his suffering, of the call to share his sufferings. I thought more about my vanity.

Wednesday
03Mar2010

The Lost Archives Are Back

I just discovered the loss of my archive links, my photo gallery, and my Amazon book list. I’ll see if I can recover the last two from my webhost. 

As for the ARCHIVES, the renewed link is at the top of the page, left side, in the header next to “home journal”. 

The archives are listed in three ways. 1. By category 2. By title…it’s a long, long list 3. By month, at the bottom of the page. 

I hope I can recover the other lost pages. If not, it will be a slow process of rebuilding. 

I’ve also re-instated an old feature, recent comments, just to your left in the sidebar, in case you want to see who is saying what lately. It seems certain older post still catch a lot of google search traffic. 

Monday
01Mar2010

Name That Thing

Humanity needs definition. Without words that name, that define our world, the world within or without, we are mere animals, living on instinct. To think, to know, to communicate, is to name things. Naming invest a thing with meaning. As Helen Keller, blind and deaf since an infant, wrote, “Everything has a name”. Definitions matter. 

By naming a person, a thing, an idea—to name anything—is to distinguish one thing from another. In doing so we also locate it; if we can say what something is we can better say where it is. This includes ourselves. Definition helps locate us in the world. With good definition we are better able to know our relationship to others who have their own names, their own locations. We are better able to see where we are, where we’ve been, or where we might go. 

However, if a word can mean anything it means nothing. Without meaning we are also dislocated, disconnected, indistinguishable in the world.

There are limits in naming, in defining things. Everything exists with an edge. To define something or someone marks a line, a boundary between what is and is not, what is mine and what is yours. Living with edges, painful though it be, is necessary. Without the edge definition creates we cannot separate or come together with any tangible meaning. We may become aliens to those we might have known by name. 

Ignoring our need of definition and the importance of a clear identity creates and multiplies confusion, as well as frustration, anger, and alienation. Reality must be definable to be lived in and lived with. 

With this said, I’ll ask a question I think is relevant today. How do I define my faith and practice in relation to God and others? (My reality is one of belief in God.)

How do I define my beliefs? How does history (events in time and space) shape or change my identity? How does culture? How does God? Each of these things has a name of their own. Do I know the relation one of these things bears to the other? 

If I cannot name my faith, how can I rightly say I have one? And does the name I give it correspond to the name others recognize as the same? If I identify my faith and practice in a way that other “believers” do not recognize, how can I have any sense of unity with them in my faith and practice? How can they have a sense of knowing me as they know themselves if we both take the name but define it differently?

But let’s go further…how do the contexts of time and place, the proximity of one thing to another, and other such matters, how might these change the meaning of thing? Does a thing mean the same thing in a different context? Change matters to us. Does it not effect meaning and definition? If so, should we resist change for the sake of feeling safer, more well-defined in a secure past than in a less-sure future?

There is this problem of our less than perfect perceptions. Like all other things, we too have our limits, limits that very with age, education, experience, health, and so forth. What I perceived as a child changes as an adult. With knowledge in time, definitions may change, broaden, expand, or even contract, just as weather alters the boundaries of the earth. 

Definition may bring certainty in an uncertain world. But the process of definition, the ongoing need to redefine the things I once knew by another name, may also bring doubt, if at least for a little while. 

As the apostle Paul said, we only know in part. We see through a glass darkly. Therefore, we need faith, hope, and love to transcend the mystery of our living ignorance, something more to pierce the unnamed darkness that threatens us. 

That “something” we need also has a name. They called his name, Jesus. 

Just a few thoughts before bedtime, a little game of “Name that Thing”. 

 

Sunday
28Feb2010

Regarding My Verbal Debauchery

Today, after my verbal debauchery last night, the Spirit led me to the following Scriptures. Apologies to those who patiently endured a fools errand. In time, like the fruit of a tree, we’ll see if any change comes, if my sentiments are real or not. At the moment, I’m not sure myself.  
“Do you see a man who is hasty in his words? There is more hope for a fool than for him.” 
Proverbs 29.20
“For a dream comes with much business, and a fool’s voice with many words”.
Ecclesiastes 3.5
“Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad, for the tree is known by its fruit. You brood of vipers! How can you speak good, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. The good person out of his good treasure brings forth good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure brings forth evil. I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak, for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.” 
Matthew 12.33-36
“Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord,
whose trust is the Lord. 
He is like a tree planted by water, 
that sends out its roots by the stream, 
and does not fear when heat comes, 
for its leaves remain green, 
and is not anxious in the year of drought, 
for it does not cease to bear fruit.” The heart is deceitful above all things,
 and desperately sick;
 who can understand it?
“ I the Lord search the heart
 and test the mind,
 to give every man according to his ways, 
according to the fruit of his deeds.”
Jeremiah 17.7-10
Now John wore a garment of camel’s hair and a leather belt around his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey. Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan were going out to him, and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bear fruit in keeping with repentance. And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.“ I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.” 
Matthew 3.4-12

 

Saturday
27Feb2010

One More Sabbath Service

I’m leaving the house soon for Sabbath worship with the smaller of my two churches, the one in Lawrenceburg, Kentucky. Planning to preach on Philippians 2.5-11. I’ve wondered if this is out of my own need or because I believe it best for the members. Not an easy question for the heart. It takes time in prayer, study, and visiting the members to know the word God has for each of us day by day, as well as on Sabbath morning. 

Too often the preacher’s felt-needs, his spiritual hunger or spiritual drought, dominate his ministry to others; his particular area’s of weakness too often control his mind and heart. They continually spew from his mouth. Only through a daily surrender of myself to the Spirit of God, only by a daily conversion, a rebirth from the flesh to the spirit, am I able to have an abiding, living relationship with Christ. 

Have this mind among yourselves which is yours in Christ Jesus”. The mind of Christ, his humble, self-sacrificing spirit, can be ours “in him”. It is ours together as his body and ours separately as believers alone with God. Knowing the weakness of our flesh as we see ourselves in “Christ crucified”, we will long for and have the spirit of his resurrection. Our obedience is to be the obedience of the cross. It comes out of death and receives the new life of his righteousness. Each day calls us, as Christ calls us, to “take up our cross” and follow him.

Jesus said that unless we do this we cannot be his disciples. That is, only in the daily experience of death and resurrection in him will we be able to follow him in the path of self-denial for the sake of others. Without this daily experience we prefer to be served rather than to serve. Our life will be the working out of our naturally self-centered heart.

The Word of God presents only one solution for the terrible work of the flesh. It is death in Christ. When we are weak enough to count ourselves dead to the world and alive to him we can have the confidence of his own abiding strength in our heart.

I have this one day, this one Sabbath day, ahead of me. I can live it through dying with Christ or I can be dead to the Spirit as I am alive to my selfish need. The choice of faith, as always, remains my own. If I will exercise this faith that he has given me, then I can make Christ my own as he has made me his own. Today I have life and death presented to me by the Word of God. The choice and the privilege of dying to live are mine in Christ.